Page 1 of 2

Hugh Laurie VV!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:28 am
by dammitjanet
sent to dreamworks addy, to Monsters vs. aliens
sent on March 15th
received on March 21st

sent letter, sase, and photos
received all three signed and personalized all to who I asked for!

The thing is the sigs look different then his others! so maybe sec.?

Image
Image
Image

Re: Hugh Laurie VV!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:50 am
by guilder1st
Actually it looks kind of like his IP, it just looks like he rushed it. It's the first TTM I've seen from him that's not a PP, so congrats on your success.

Re: Hugh Laurie VV!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:24 am
by macaoidh
Great success. Hugh is great in House. I just sent my request out to him, I hope I will get a great success like yours

Re: Hugh Laurie VV!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:34 am
by ne0ven0m
Great success since he uses SFM!!

Re: Hugh Laurie VV!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:49 am
by dammitjanet
good luck to all!

Re: Hugh Laurie VV!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:44 am
by lizane
Hi dammitjanet! ;-)

Thank you for your feedback. {up} Fantastic success - congrats!! {thumb2} Hugh is a great actor! :mrgreen:

You have been added to the list for the $10 allposters.com gift certificate. {up}

{star} Hugh Laurie on Fanmail.biz | Previous Feedback(s) Received

8)
Lizanne

Re: Hugh Laurie VV!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:23 am
by BlueSky
Congrats thats an awesome success!! and I love the photos you sent especially the first one
the inscriptions are adorable {love}

Re: Hugh Laurie VV!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:08 am
by RoverBowden
Great success.

I love him

do you know if the adress is still valid?

Re: Hugh Laurie VV!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:11 am
by dammitjanet
I don't know the film dates! sorry! but I just sent it not too long ago it should still be good for a couple weeks probably

Re: Hugh Laurie VV!

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:53 pm
by RuleroftheWorld
dammitjanet wrote:
The thing is the sigs look different then his others! so maybe sec.?
I would agree with secretarial. The inscriptions are not done by him, they're not his handwriting. And the sigs themselves just dont seem right, plus they appear to have been done by the same hand as the inscription, so my opinion is secretarial.