Fanmail.biz

I know it would probably be eaiser for the actor to send a pic for him to sign, but just wanted to know which would get a better response! Thanks

It would be best to send a photo because some actors/actresses do not have pictures in their hands and might not reply if they don't have a pic to sign

i agree some actors/actresses don't have there own photos to sign and i suppose if you dont send a pic then you wont get a responce but generally i think most actors/actresses would have their own photos because of the amount of fanmail they get, if you don't have a photo then include a index card thats generally what i do if i have nothing to send to them {thumb2}

I would send a photo, because it shows that you are a true fan of the star

My opininon is if you send a photo, it makes you look too 'professional', and therefore may come across as a dealer. Just my opinion though.

I have never sent a photo, apart from ones of me & the celebrity to be signed. If a celeb doesn't have a photo, they'll have letterheaded paper which they'll write a note & sign on. 99% of celebrities have pictures- even if they dont, chances are an agent will get them one if it is requested.

I send index cards as they are cheap and dont look to 'professional'

James

I agree with James, the only time I send photos are when Im sending via venue