Wow.. Autograph Collector magazine.. JOKESTERS...

[Robert]

OK.. A few months ago, AC magazine posted that Pacino signs authentically in the mail.. Ok.. Well, I decided to send AGAIN to the NY address.. Same sec. autos.. Now everyone has been reading the mag, thinking that there pacino autos are real..

This months issue, shows my email to Larry Grobel.. It has been edited from the email a little bit.. He took outt he part where i posted the NY address..

In his reply, he states that the autographs from the CA address are real. Hmm, what address is that!?

So, I followed up with an email today that reads

"What you said may be correct.. The CALIFORNIA ADDRESS may be what he signs from.. But there Is NO WAY that the signatures that come from NYare Pacinos. Those are secretary autographs. I can prove this point by sending my pictures to be authenticated. Then what happens? Will you publish the document and apologize in your magazine that anything sent to his newyork address will be secretarial? Would you also be willing to pay for my psa/dna authentication when it comes back FAILED? I look forward to hearing from you! Why didn’t you post the CA address? Why did you also make 2-3 references to NY, giving the impression that his NY address would be a good address to send!"

Robert Barrow


We shall see what the future brings.. I may just be sending something off to be authenticated.. In the meantime, i look forward to seeing how many hits i get from having my website posted in his forum..



Robert

[whosurdaddy]

That whole article was a joke. Funny how that article came out about the same time he was promoting his book on Pacino and he states a calif. address but recently all mail I've seen sent to Pacino's NY address is being forwarded to calif. and is coming back with the same secretarial sig. The whole article was nothing more than to draw attention to Pacino and his book. Big publicity stunt.