Page 1 of 1

Question about 16x20, 11x14, and 8x10

Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 3:38 am
by jjj
Is it true the bigger the picture the more valueable the graph? so 16x20 is worth the most signed and 8x10 the least signed? lmk your thoughts

Re: Question about 16x20, 11x14, and 8x10

Posted: Fri May 21, 2010 3:46 am
by Nathan1872002
In my experience the bigger the photo, the more the value. Only because, in my opinion, they are more rare to find. It's easy to find a signed 8x10 of just about anybody, but bigger versions of photos usually are able to sell for more and have more value because of rarity. From a visual standpoint I would say you are right just because bigger photos are easier to see and pick out on a wall and really stand out.

Re: Question about 16x20, 11x14, and 8x10

Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2023 3:30 am
by RYAN J.
For me, I don't give a rip about the size of the photo. I mostly care about what the image is and how nice the signature looks. Now if I'm doing a multi-signed photo, then yes, I'd go for the bigger sizes, but if I'm just getting one signature then 4x6 is fine with me. {up} Since I mainly do TTM, the smaller sizes are less expensive to print & send out compared to 8x10's which cost about 10 times more to print and twice the cost to send. {down}

RYAN J. 8)