Page 1 of 1
Elizabeth Taylor (Recent Sucesss)
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 10:21 pm
by lukasbracewell
I wanted to share this autograph with you all. I recieved this one in 2005. I don't have the dates handy right now though.
I sent to:
Elizabeth Taylor
c/o Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation
P.O. Box 55995
Sherman Oaks, CA 91413-0995
I have only seen 1 other ACTUAL sucess from that address. The rest are all preprints. (the picture of her with her dog) Is it authentic? Opinions are welcome!
http://www.geocities.com/guitar_freak_04/et.html
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:25 am
by wharfrat57
I know that if you send a photo, SASE, and a donation to the AIDS foundation she will sign. I had a success a few years ago with this address and doing what I stated above. I'm sure for the rest of the requests she sends out the PP photo's still.
auto
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:00 am
by lukasbracewell
Did the autograph you got from her with a donation look like this one? I didn't send a donation though.
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:06 am
by wharfrat57
I sent 2 photo's, and SASE. She signed this one, and not the other. I made the donation because I thought it would help. Here's the one she did sign. She also threw in a little flyer thanking me for the donation.
Thanks..
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:12 am
by lukasbracewell
Wow! They look identical! I think mine is authentic! I am a younger guy, so she might have wanted to actually send an autograph for a younger fan. I don't know? I think it's either 100% authentic or an autopen.
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:17 am
by wharfrat57
I can't compare yours. When I click on your link it keeps coming up
Sorry, this GeoCities site is currently unavailable.
Can you add the photo to your post? Like via Imageshack?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:31 am
by lukasbracewell
yours and mine
Do you think there authentic? Wouldn't it be really hard for anyone to sign their name almost exactly the same evertime?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:34 am
by wharfrat57
They sure look to be auto-penned. That's what I'm seeing comparing the two. What do you think?
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:55 am
by lukasbracewell
yeah, I'm begining to doubt the authenticity of them too.
Look @ these-
NOTICEABLE DIFFERENCES-
The lower part of the T is wider in the second one.
The dots on the i in Elizabeth are in different spots.
Notice that when she starts her E it is always a very thin stroke, and gets bigger as she, or the machine, continues writing.
I wish I could find an inperson sig. I don't know where the first one came from, but the second was through the mail c/o the Aids Foundation.
Another thing that made me doubt the authenticity was that I recieved the picture last year, when she was so sick. ???I dunno.
