Page 1 of 1

Just wondering

Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 11:58 am
by orlinik28
I know this isn't really relevant but I was thinking, isn't sending out secretarials technically fraud? Shouldn't they have to say somewhere that the autograph you're receiving isn't signed by the actor?
I think it would be useful if this did happen as then at least people would know 100% what they've got.
Anyone have any thoughts? :D

Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:01 pm
by TheMailman
This also crossed my mind. I hate secretarials :(

Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:16 pm
by Logan-Autograph-Guy
me too, I think stars that are very busy should just sign a stack of photos a month and send them out :D