Sarah Jessica Parker

Ronnieke · Unread post by **Ronnieke** » Thu Dec 15, 2011 11:13 am

Send on 26/09/11 LOR , SASE and 2 photo's . On 15/12/11 I recieved my photo's signed

P.O. Box 69646
Los Angeles, Ca 90069
U.S.A

photo 1 : http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/9278/scannen0004s.jpg

photo 2 : http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/6614 ... n0003b.jpg

Bartosz994 · Unread post by **Bartosz994** » Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:28 pm

What do you think, it`s authentic autograph ?
Maybe I will send to her

vivalakayla · Unread post by **vivalakayla** » Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:41 pm

It's sec, unfortunately. =/

njkelly · Unread post by **njkelly** » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:22 am

These are both secretarials. SJP lives in NYC to begin with. Anything from the LA address is not her signature. Having met her in person and obtaining her autograph, I can tell you 100% that this is not even close to being her signature

charger88 · Unread post by **charger88** » Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:47 am

njkelly wrote:These are both secretarials. SJP lives in NYC to begin with. Anything from the LA address is not her signature. Having met her in person and obtaining her autograph, I can tell you 100% that this is not even close to being her signature

It's a good think the guy asked for opinions

Unread post by **loveryan** » Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:39 am

Congrats!
At least, you got something ;)

Ronnieke · Unread post by **Ronnieke** » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:25 am

Thanks loveryan for wishing me succes . Secretarial or not I don't mind !! Thanks you guys for the good news telling me it's secretarial . I didn't ask for opinions but that don't hold you guys . I'm happy with my response and that's what matters !

vivalakayla · Unread post by **vivalakayla** » Fri Dec 16, 2011 3:58 pm

Ronnieke wrote:Thanks loveryan for wishing me succes . Secretarial or not I don't mind !! Thanks you guys for the good news telling me it's secretarial . I didn't ask for opinions but that don't hold you guys . I'm happy with my response and that's what matters !

You didn't ask. But the user who wrote below you, did.

macainautos · Unread post by **macainautos** » Sat Dec 17, 2011 8:08 am

vivalakayla wrote:
Ronnieke wrote:Thanks loveryan for wishing me succes . Secretarial or not I don't mind !! Thanks you guys for the good news telling me it's secretarial . I didn't ask for opinions but that don't hold you guys . I'm happy with my response and that's what matters !

You didn't ask. But the user who wrote below you, did.

Well, if you're going to get technical about it, the user that asked was asking the orignal poster...

vivalakayla · Unread post by **vivalakayla** » Sat Dec 17, 2011 3:04 pm

macainautos wrote:Well, if you're going to get technical about it, the user that asked was asking the orignal poster...

& the OP didn't know it was sec, so probably would have told the asking user it's authentic. Making that user write to Sarah, only to recieve a sec signed photo... and believe it's real. Then go on & tell other people it's authentic. Only to have other people waste time & stamps. It's a vicious cycle, really.

If anyone wants to waste time & $$ on a sec - by all means. Gooooo for it! =)

Sarah Jessica Parker

Sarah Jessica Parker

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

Re: Sarah Jessica Parker

Who is online


Fanmail.biz	Message Board