Why is there even a debate weather the Victoria Justice photos that this agency sends out are pre prints? Who cares what they say..just look at the freaking signature lol its on the exact same spot. I have one also...dancingirl1 wrote:--I dont call people out for no reason. People have already said IDK what i'm talking about when in fact I DO. I'm the type of person where i wont let someone THINK that their photo is real UNLESS they say "I don't wanna know" then I will respect what they said..but I decided to say it before someone else says it. That's not bad, I save myself that way. If people get upset that I call them out, then they shouldn't say anything about me. --NO SFM doesn't admit it. The company sends a photo with a blank back. Would u be so kind as to post a link to this "letter" from Julie please. Thanks. Also there are no agencies that will admit to sending fakes out...if there are, what are they?MW1221 wrote: 1) That's the problem with your attitude. You call people out FOR NO REASON and see no problem with it.
2) SFM admits it, CM admits it, Robbie Coltrane sends out a letter with his PP's that admit it, Julie Andrews does the same, Rowan Atkinson does the same...
3) Your proof is far from definitive, but I believe I asked you for the exact moment where I told you that I didn't believe you, if you're going to charge that I don't.
Some celebs sends out a letter saying "they are too busy to sign" but i dont believe i ever seen "Here is a pre print" I mean its possible..but i havent seen it myself.
And the back is MOST of the time blank or has a way to keep up with the celeb like a site or something. But 95% of the fakes don't say "...____________ does not sign photos individually." They DONT. 
