
address:
via: Thor The Dark World
(still valid)
sent: letter, 3 photos and SASE, 23rd August 2012
received: his signed photo, my photos didn't return, 20th September 2012
photo:

Agreed, although I'm fairly sure they're pre-signed.livbernardes wrote:I can be wrong but analysing the time the letter was sent and when you get replied, I guess Shepperton Studios sent your letter to Tom's agency and so H. Hodell sent this PP to you...
Agreed. It is not a PP. Tom pre-signed a stack. I got ta pre-signed photo twice when I sent to Hamilton Hodell and a VV earleir in the year. The signature is slightly different in both and I received both within days of each other.Lauren81492 wrote:Agreed, although I'm fairly sure they're pre-signed.livbernardes wrote:I can be wrong but analysing the time the letter was sent and when you get replied, I guess Shepperton Studios sent your letter to Tom's agency and so H. Hodell sent this PP to you...
Reading the definition of "PP" ( Pre-Print/Facsimile - an exact reproduction of a person's signature. Often photocopied, or electronicaly duplicated) in this forum I noticed I choose the wrongs words. In fact I wanted to say "pre-signed" or "PSP" which means Tom did signed all these black&white photos, this is what I believeff_angel wrote:Agreed. It is not a PP. Tom pre-signed a stack. I got ta pre-signed photo twice when I sent to Hamilton Hodell and a VV earleir in the year. The signature is slightly different in both and I received both within days of each other.Lauren81492 wrote:Agreed, although I'm fairly sure they're pre-signed.livbernardes wrote:I can be wrong but analysing the time the letter was sent and when you get replied, I guess Shepperton Studios sent your letter to Tom's agency and so H. Hodell sent this PP to you...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests