SARAH JESSICA PARKER SUCCESS :)

[stillluckyas13canbe]

I know it is but it dose not matter coz I like Sarah Jessica parker

Then STOP listing them as being a SUCCESS and making no mention of not being genuine. Several of your "successes" are blatantly not genuine signatures, and newbies on the forum may think they are and then waste their money for nothing. It's pretty simple to be honest...

NOT SIGNED BY THE CELEBRITY = NOT A GENUINELY SIGNED SUCCESS

[beckyloveschris13]

Well then u stop posting on my wall u fucking freek

[stillluckyas13canbe]

Well then u stop posting on my wall u **** freek

Oh dear, someone who doesn't like reality.
And there was me being perfectly nice, and indeed actually helping you out on another post.
Is this a "wall"? I didn't realise, thought it was a public forum.

Oh, and mind your language, it just shows you up to be the child you are and will earn you a Moderator Warning.

[beckyloveschris13]

Well u are telling to STOP posting some picture u do not tell me what I can & cannot do if I want to put pictures on here I will so do not tell tell me what I can & cannot do

[stillluckyas13canbe]

Well u are telling to STOP posting some picture u do not tell me what I can & cannot do if I want to put pictures on here I will so do not tell tell me what I can & cannot do

Care to read the posts again?
I said it would be a good idea to mark them as being "non authentic" so that inexperienced collectors don't make a mistake in thinking they can get an authentic autograph through those contacts. Put the pictures where you want, there's loads of non authentics posted here, though I don't class them as a success, they are still feedback.

[beckyloveschris13]

Dose it matter if it is a non authentic it is still a autograph it dose not matter if it is a non authentic or not

[stillluckyas13canbe]

Dose it matter if it is a non authentic it is still a autograph it dose not matter if it is a non authentic or not

Seriously? Seriously?

Does it matter if the "autograph" is genuine? If it doesn't matter, you might as well sign your photos yourself.

Surely the whole point in writing to get a signed item is that the item comes back signed by the person you write to? If not, then I have this whole game all wrong, and could be making millions by selling Tom Hanks signatures signed by myself.

[James]

Wow, on that logic, if authenticity doesn't matter then I have the autographs from all my most wanteds. Wow, thanks for bringing this revelation into my life! I can retire a happy autograph collector



Oh, wait..

[beckyloveschris13]

I did send her a letter asking for her autograph & the picture I put on here is what I got back it is the only one I got from her

[stillluckyas13canbe]

I did send her a letter asking for her autograph & the picture I put on here is what I got back it is the only one I got from her

Okay, no one is disputing you sent her a letter asking for an autograph, and no one is disputing this is what you got back. The point being raised is that it's not been genuinely signed by Sarah Jessica Parker, and if you knew that (as you said in one post previously) then it's best to label it as such. For example, "Received - Preprinted Signed Photo" or "I got this photo back, sadly it's a PP".

If you don't know it's not a genuine signature when you receive it, fair enough, but several members pointed this out politely on this, and other threads (ie the Bonnie Wright one), and your response was to go ape at members who were trying to help. Members will always be happy to help if you ask for advice on the signature, and equally members will always point out if it's not genuine, for just the reasons I have given already... to prevent others from wasting time and money.

Feedback is feedback, be it a genuine signature, a PP or an RTS, but you have to label accordingly so no one else makes the same mistake as (most!) collectors prefer a real signature, for obvious reasons.