Paul Mccartney authenticity.

[wburke]

Hi all. I have come across this Macca autograph. Its stated that it was signed 23/09/1975 at Dundee Caird Hall. Is it real though? The only thing i can see which i know is a genuine Macca autograph is on the sleeve for his kisses on the bottom album and they look similar but i dont know. So guys what do you think?

[nikita2]

It is fake, dude.
You can believe me

[wburke]

What makes you say its a fake? Im not disagreeing with you just want your reasoning.

[mymymy]

Above all else, without doing any research on his signature, I can tell that it looks so drawn. It's so blatant, can you see that?

[clifffoto]

Signature is not fluid and it looks like someone wanted it to look like a Paul McCartney signature. Obtained him in person before and his signature is fluid unlike a forged or autopen signature which appears fake. Nothing personal, just business.

[stillluckyas13canbe]

What they said, it's so blatantly not real I am shocked you have to ask.

Also, this is not feedback ;)

[wburke]

Please don't be harsh on me im new to the field. It was given to me by my grandad who said he obtained it in person which is whats puzzling me the most though, he wouldnt lie? would he?

[CHIgrapher]

Graph Is about as fake as you cam get.

The paper its on looks real though.

[ladystardust19]

I don't think your Grandfather was trying to lie, but just come up with a cool story to tell his grandson. It looks to me like someone sat down and SLOWLY tried to write Paul McCartney's name the same way Paul does. Would it have been authentic, there would have been more of a free flow to it. This to me looks very tight and very tense. Sorry, but I also say FAKE.

[DAY TRIPPER]

i agree with everyone else,
its a great attempt at his sig, but it looks very slowly drawn out, not quick and fluid