Kareem Abdul-Jabbar

[MW1221]

Got to say, not my area of expertise, but seems to match up pretty well with the signatures in his official shop.

That being said, this entire argument could have been negated if you had linked to an image of the item. Seems pretty pointless not to have, when you uploaded to ST. It's also pretty much common sense to say you got your item back signed in the first post.

Of course none of this proves either way if you paid for the autograph, but hey, it would have been a start and dealt with some of the issues raised.

Paid for the autograph or googled "Kareem Abdul-Jabbar autograph" and used that as their picture.

[yanksfan]

Ok, I know my first post was a joke, but this one isn't. MW1221: You blame people for starting fights, yet you incessantly continue them, making you as bad as whoever you blamed in the first placed. And CrazyCooter: Your original post was probably the most vague thing I've ever read in my life. So my solution to both of you quarreling children is this: you must type "I will not be a hypocritical idiot and post things that actually make sense" 100 times. The victor (first to post it,) shall hereby be claimed the winner of this argument. Now go!

[MW1221]

Ok, I know my first post was a joke, but this one isn't. MW1221: You blame people for starting fights, yet you incessantly continue them, making you as bad as whoever you blamed in the first placed. And CrazyCooter: Your original post was probably the most vague thing I've ever read in my life. So my solution to both of you quarreling children is this: you must type "I will not be a hypocritical idiot and post things that actually make sense" 100 times. The victor (first to post it,) shall hereby be claimed the winner of this argument. Now go!

There's a difference between posting something rational and related to the topic and posting a blatant attack for no reason.

If you can't see the difference between posting "Evil troll" and posting "There's no evidence that this autograph was obtained TTM", I can't help you.

[DiamondDave]

Ok, I know my first post was a joke, but this one isn't. MW1221: You blame people for starting fights, yet you incessantly continue them, making you as bad as whoever you blamed in the first placed. And CrazyCooter: Your original post was probably the most vague thing I've ever read in my life. So my solution to both of you quarreling children is this: you must type "I will not be a hypocritical idiot and post things that actually make sense" 100 times. The victor (first to post it,) shall hereby be claimed the winner of this argument. Now go!

There's a difference between posting something rational and related to the topic and posting a blatant attack for no reason.

If you can't see the difference between posting "Evil troll" and posting "There's no evidence that this autograph was obtained TTM", I can't help you.

You're just another hypocrite.
You don't like my approach, I don't like yours....or some other "contributors".

[MW1221]

Ok, I know my first post was a joke, but this one isn't. MW1221: You blame people for starting fights, yet you incessantly continue them, making you as bad as whoever you blamed in the first placed. And CrazyCooter: Your original post was probably the most vague thing I've ever read in my life. So my solution to both of you quarreling children is this: you must type "I will not be a hypocritical idiot and post things that actually make sense" 100 times. The victor (first to post it,) shall hereby be claimed the winner of this argument. Now go!

There's a difference between posting something rational and related to the topic and posting a blatant attack for no reason.

If you can't see the difference between posting "Evil troll" and posting "There's no evidence that this autograph was obtained TTM", I can't help you.

You're just another hypocrite.
You don't like my approach, I don't like yours....or some other "contributors".

See, this is an example of an unproductive post. It does nothing but attack, with no evidence to back up said attack whatsoever.

Does that help, yanksfan?

[yanksfan]

If you can't see the difference between your post and Diamond Dave's post, I can't help you.

[MW1221]

If you can't see the difference between your post and Diamond Dave's post, I can't help you.

I can see the difference, which is why I illustrated the difference in my post...

[yanksfan]

Here is the REAL difference. Diamond expresses his opinion about you, so you respnd with a subtly insulting reply. In the end, there is no difference, only you're the one who truly starts the arguments. And as you sit there fretting over your online reputation, I just sit here and relish at how much I am enjoying this.

[MW1221]

Here is the REAL difference. Diamond expresses his opinion about you, so you respnd with a subtly insulting reply. In the end, there is no difference, only you're the one who truly starts the arguments. And as you sit there fretting over your online reputation, I just sit here and relish at how much I am enjoying this.

Please point out to me where I posted an opinion of any kind that featured no facts backing it up.

[Zaj]

Here is the REAL difference. Diamond expresses his opinion about you, so you respnd with a subtly insulting reply. In the end, there is no difference, only you're the one who truly starts the arguments. And as you sit there fretting over your online reputation, I just sit here and relish at how much I am enjoying this.

Please point out to me where I posted an opinion of any kind that featured no facts backing it up.

MW almost always supports their opinion. They actually try and avoid conflict most of the time too... Just my two cents.