Dick Van Dyke Success!

[magicmanplc]

Ok

[MJS73]

I didn't misspell a word.

[cagneyfan]

Jason 1980s and cjhanson - Thank you for educating me with regard to secretarials and whatever. I appreciate your comments and believe them to be true. And everyone else - don't listen to these negative posters - they just want to start arguments and admire their own posts. They are like the kids who save their ice cream until all the other kids have finished theirs, so they can brag and tease the other kids into having a meaningless altercation. Ignore them.

[cjhanson]

Confusing...

His fanmail account shows "cjhanson" yet the email has arrived on fanmail reads as "cjhansom"

If they are real, then perhaps it's someone trying to pose as CJ to cause trouble for him.

You are right. It's not him. I am so sorry cjhanson. I thought it was you. Someone is trying to start trouble. Look who I got the message from. Look at this.

I'm glad this other troublemaker who was trying to impersonate me has been nabbed and my reputation restored.

[MW1221]

Some of the photos from the private signing mentioned in the posting by jason1980s. Hopefully this settles the argument about his TTMs being secretarials, but I'm sure there will be people saying, "The signatures look different because he signed in a hurry so he could make as much money as he could!!"

These pictures would've been a lot better if Todd wasn't such a d*ck who doesn't understand that it's possible to watermark a photo without destroying the one part of it people want to see.

Do you have any cleaner ones?

Thanks!

[Jammydodger]

Some of the photos from the private signing mentioned in the posting by jason1980s. Hopefully this settles the argument about his TTMs being secretarials, but I'm sure there will be people saying, "The signatures look different because he signed in a hurry so he could make as much money as he could!!"

These pictures would've been a lot better if Todd wasn't such a d*ck who doesn't understand that it's possible to watermark a photo without destroying the one part of it people want to see.

Do you have any cleaner ones?

Thanks!

Here once again you are calling Todd a d*ck everyone's one but you right!

http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 17&t=61235

What a knob. :razz:

Edit. He's always calling and swearing at others on here I'm just simply pointing out what a thick silly b@stard he is. Lol.

[MW1221]

Some of the photos from the private signing mentioned in the posting by jason1980s. Hopefully this settles the argument about his TTMs being secretarials, but I'm sure there will be people saying, "The signatures look different because he signed in a hurry so he could make as much money as he could!!"

These pictures would've been a lot better if Todd wasn't such a d*ck who doesn't understand that it's possible to watermark a photo without destroying the one part of it people want to see.

Do you have any cleaner ones?

Thanks!

Here once again you are calling Todd a d*ck everyone's one but you right!

http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... 17&t=61235

What a knob. :razz:

Edit. He's always calling and swearing at others on here I'm just simply pointing out what a thick silly b@stard he is. Lol.

Yes, and every single time, I've pointed out to you how stupid you are. You're yet to respond each time.

Congratulations on not bothering to read any of these threads you're pulling out. It must take real talent to be so stupid that you think you can prove someone's stupidity without actually reading what they wrote in the post that you're using to prove their stupidity.

For example, if you read that thread, you'd see that the answer to the question I asked is "Yes". But you probably posted it because you KNOW the answer is no, right? Congratulations, that makes you stupid!

Now how about you explain to me what part of what I said is wrong?

If you ruin a photo because you HAVE to brand it in such a way that ruins the photo, you're a d*ck.

There are ways to watermark the signature in ways that don't obscure that one part of the photo that people want to see. If you don't do that in favor of one's that do, you're a d*ck.

Now, again, what part of that is wrong?

But you still won't answer this, because it require you to admit that you're the stupidest one in this conversation, because you, once again, can't answer the very questions that you call others stupid for asking.

We're not even going to get into your shitty grammar and your use of logical fallacies, because I don't think your brain can handle it, and it might explode. And as much of a service that would be for the community at large, someone out there would probably be disappointed, and that's not fair to the Dumbfuck Society of America.

[MW1221]

Oh and if I wanted to swear here, I wouldn't have censored myself, because that word doesn't censor on this board. If it did, this entire thread would be made of asterisks.

But again, you're too stupid to see that.

[Historical]

Oh and if I wanted to swear here, I wouldn't have censored myself, because that word doesn't censor on this board. If it did, this entire thread would be made of asterisks.

But again, you're too stupid to see that.

Hopefully the mods will ban this ass soon. What a knob.

[MW1221]

I read all this thread this afternoon it made me laugh out loud. Who needs tv or movies too watch when you have these arsewipes arguing about Sellotape and sticking coins in an envelope ? Lmfao. Sad twats.

Yeah, I know!

Just like ones who go around calling them twats!