Claudi wrote:Thanks for your responses...Well I don´t think it is a dumb idea to laminate the autographs.
Ok, if you don't think it's stupid to destroy your autographs, then that's your call.
Claudi wrote:( I received autographs with silver pens that would not last long)
Well now they really won't.
Hairspray holds silver in place.
Lamination destroys the signature & picture.
Claudi wrote:Somehow or other it was a success feedback and everyone should decide for themselves how to collect autographs

That's right, but most people choose not to destroy their collection. But, again, that's your call.
WaltG123 !=
WaltG123. &
WaltG123,There's a difference between blue text & a URL, ****. Those who can't read
will be added to my ignore list.
WaltG123 wrote:WaltG123. wrote:Actually it's just occurred to me. Nobody but her will know why she's signed it twice so please ignore my silly question.

Awww, how cute. Someone who thinks that people will be dumb enough to believe that they're me, despite the blatant period & completely different post numbers.
And, of course, the obvious fact that if, if it were me, I would've edited the post, not replied to it. Not to mention it's not necessarily true that "nobody but her will know why she signed it twice" & I'm smart enough to know that.
Not to mention the grammatical mistakes.
But, please, carry on. You can help me find more people to add to my ignore list. I don't need to be bothered reading posts by users that are stupid enough to believe that these 2 accounts are the same. I appreciate the help in weeding out the ****. So thank you.
