Casino Royale - Discussion Thread

Discussion of current events and participation in intelligent conversation with other Fanmail.biz users.
New Fanmail.biz Users: Introduce Yourself Here! 8)
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!

Image Search the message board Image

Rate Casino Royale

You may select 1 option

 
 
View results

User avatar
Volante
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:15 pm
Contact:

Casino Royale - Discussion Thread

Unread post by Volante »

:P

Feel free to discuss the new Bond film Casino Royale in this thread

I'll join in when I've seen it (2 days left)

BOND IS BACK!
Image
click banner to check out my autographs :)
User avatar
TheMailman
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 2655
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:05 pm
Contact:

Unread post by TheMailman »

Obsessed or what Johan lol?

I saw it the day after release and I must say that there are only three faults:

1) The song used (let's just say it's not like Tina or Shirley).
2) Daniel Craig seemed a bit stiff and unrealistic in some parts.
3) There are no gadgets at all.

Overall it is very enjoyable and Eva Green is very good portraying her character. Casino Royale has been said to be one of the best Bond movies.

It's in the top 250 movies on IMDB.com
User avatar
celebrityfan
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 1441
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:37 am
Contact:

Unread post by celebrityfan »

Hey TheMailMan, just want to comment on your pointers! :D

1) The song used (let's just say it's not like Tina or Shirley).

It was different, the director always said the film was going to be different to the others - and plus to entice younger viewers (like me :D ) they needed a fresh sound. (Don't take me wrong though, Tina and Shirley are fantastic)

2) Daniel Craig seemed a bit stiff and unrealistic in some parts.

He wasn't stiff, he was collected and calm. I thought that Daniel Craig was the best Bond, and I've seen them all!

3) There are no gadgets at all.

I had to remember that this is technically the first film, and so James Bond wasn't yet trusted enough by M to be given expensive and deadly gadgets.

I thought this was a great mix of action, thrills and light humour. Most Bond girls were eye-candy - and in 'Casino Royale', Eva Green showed a different side and was smart and sophisticated. The bad guy, Mads Mikkelsen, was brilliant! The blood weeping from his eye was great, loved that about him.

What can I say about Daniel Craig? BRILLIANT, AMAZING, INCREDIBLE - these words shot into my mind during the film. And he had a great body, no one can deny that! :D Him being blond didn't bother me either, it's new and different - and it was a good difference! :D

Some scenes will make you squirm in your seat...guys in particular - but it wasn't just there as a time-filler, it actually had purpose! :D

Go and see it, otherwise you'll regret it! :mrgreen:
:D Steph :D

Auto count: 185

Gerard Butler = The Next Bond

Visit my site! http://www.freewebs.com/celebrityfanautos

Image
Credit to: hangman
User avatar
Volante
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:15 pm
Contact:

Unread post by Volante »

Thanks for you replies guys, nice reviews!

Hehe yep, I'm somewhat obsessed ;)

I'm sure I'll love it!

Friday 7 pm and Saturday 8 pm, here I come! 8)
(dont ask)

;)
Image
click banner to check out my autographs :)
User avatar
TheMailman
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 2655
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:05 pm
Contact:

Unread post by TheMailman »

celebrityfan wrote:Hey TheMailMan, just want to comment on your pointers! :D

1) The song used (let's just say it's not like Tina or Shirley).

It was different, the director always said the film was going to be different to the others - and plus to entice younger viewers (like me :D ) they needed a fresh sound. (Don't take me wrong though, Tina and Shirley are fantastic)

2) Daniel Craig seemed a bit stiff and unrealistic in some parts.

He wasn't stiff, he was collected and calm. I thought that Daniel Craig was the best Bond, and I've seen them all!

3) There are no gadgets at all.

I had to remember that this is technically the first film, and so James Bond wasn't yet trusted enough by M to be given expensive and deadly gadgets.

I thought this was a great mix of action, thrills and light humour. Most Bond girls were eye-candy - and in 'Casino Royale', Eva Green showed a different side and was smart and sophisticated. The bad guy, Mads Mikkelsen, was brilliant! The blood weeping from his eye was great, loved that about him.

What can I say about Daniel Craig? BRILLIANT, AMAZING, INCREDIBLE - these words shot into my mind during the film. And he had a great body, no one can deny that! :D Him being blond didn't bother me either, it's new and different - and it was a good difference! :D

Some scenes will make you squirm in your seat...guys in particular - but it wasn't just there as a time-filler, it actually had purpose! :D

Go and see it, otherwise you'll regret it! :mrgreen:
I think I know what you mean when you say 'guys will squirm' as that's what I did lol.

Don't get me wrong as I know there are alot of female fans but the Bond franchise usually has a male following. I believe the reason they added the beach scenes was too indise females to see the new film as well.

I see what your getting at with the whole 'gadget' theory, I completely forgot it was the first one :lol:
User avatar
Volante
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:15 pm
Contact:

Unread post by Volante »

One day left

{liam}

You're the only voters so far :P
Image
click banner to check out my autographs :)
F.A.D.E
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 5:24 pm
Contact:

Unread post by F.A.D.E »

Volante wrote:One day left

{liam}

You're the only voters so far :P
Hope you have a great time seeing the movie, Johan! Hopefully you won't go dressed as Mr. Bond himself?? :lol:

Fatima xxx
User avatar
Volante
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 5:15 pm
Contact:

Unread post by Volante »

Hehe nope, I won't wear a tux, I promise! ;)

I must ask them for a cinema poster aswell, maybe I can get one :P
Image
click banner to check out my autographs :)
F.A.D.E
Posts: 2423
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 5:24 pm
Contact:

Unread post by F.A.D.E »

That's a great idea :D

Fatima xxx
Mighty_Modders
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 388
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 10:07 pm
Contact:

Unread post by Mighty_Modders »

i thought it was a great film, just what the series needed. could not fault daniel craig - athough i found his mouth distracting at times :P

it had everything, a good bad guy (he cries blood and has greasy hair and a scar - what more could you want?)

the action scenes were brilliant - theres some pretty exciting stuff that goes on in that film. quite dark in places, but its good. to be honest i havent thought much of the past few films, i havent thought much of the storylines and they seemed to be going into the realms of fantasy a bit much. i thought it was quite good in this one that it didnt rely on gadgets and all that, it was just him.

in conclusion - woo. id definitely go see that again. even if its just for the comfy chair which did make me laugh :P probably wouldnt have if i was a bloke...

{up}


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests