Should i get my original 1960's photos signed??

You can also post suggestions, comments to the fanmail.biz database managers here. Do not post your feedback here. Do not request a celebrity address here.
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur
lozzbeech
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:07 am
Contact:

Should i get my original 1960's photos signed??

Unread post by lozzbeech »

hey guys... i have just purchased some original 1960's photographs of Carol Burnett and Julie Andrews rehearsing for one of their tv specials. They are worth quite abit of money now, do u think they would be worth more if i had them signed?? or do you think that it would spoil them a little?? i can't make up my mind....

Everyone's help/opinions would be much appreciated...

cheers........
Nammzi
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:27 pm
Contact:

Unread post by Nammzi »

If they are special to you then I wouldn't send them as there is a chance that you may not get them sent back. I don't see why it would ruin the photos, but it ia really up to you.
Image
Here comes the world and she is beautifully mysterious

http://scottishspca.fotopic.net/
lozzbeech
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:07 am
Contact:

Unread post by lozzbeech »

Nammzi wrote:If they are special to you then I wouldn't send them as there is a chance that you may not get them sent back. I don't see why it would ruin the photos, but it ia really up to you.
Yes.. that is true. That wouldn't be good if i didn't get them back. They are not the kind of celebs who are out and about that much though.. so would be hard to get them IP. i'll have to think more..
Thanks for replying...


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests