Fudgemonkey

[elmomommyto2]

This JM is becoming a very big nuisance. Today I've deleted these two of his comments from the chatbox:

Fudgemonkey « Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:12 am » Check out my new post in the Junior Moderators Forum! It's about pakman14!!!

Fudgemonkey « Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:15 am » i have exploited pakman14 for the cheater he is

This member is NOT anywhere near ready to be a moderator and I can't see why he's been made a JM either .

[Chrissy]

I CANNOT believe that. To me that screams "I should not be a junior mod". Why? because no one has the right to do that to anyone publicly. If Fudgemonkey has a problem with pakman i think he should deal with him through PM and if that doesn't work Admin should be notified.

I hope something gets done about this!

Chrissy

[elmomommyto2]

I agree Chrissy {thumb2}! This EXACT thing has been brought up MULTIPLE times in the JM forum about resolving problems with specific members through PMs, rather than broadcasting it, and yet some JMs are continuing to not listen :mad:. Fudgemonkey was also another JM that was unlocking and re-locking topics after they had already been locked too !

[Chrissy]

I agree with you both, when i see something like that it makes it obvious to me who should and shouldn't be a JM. There are more proper ways to resolving your issues. Broadcasting it for everyone is just childish and it will just end up hurting more than one person. For example...Fudgemonkey has publicly posted PM's he has privately shared with OTHER members of the forum. I don't know if he has asked their permission to post these pm's but to me its really wrong. Private Messages are PRIVATE and should only be read by the sender or reciever and admin if the problem exceeds to that standard. I also don't agree with publicly putting people user names in his post. It just seems to me that he wants to point fingers and make sure everyone else knows that others may feel slightly the same as him.

Chrissy

[elmomommyto2]

elmomommyto2
Message subject: Re: Why did you lock the topic?Folder: Outbox
Fudgemonkey,

I locked the topic because it's very inappropriate for you to have made the topic in the first place. As has been discussed multiple times in the JM forum, these matters need to be dealt with by PM first with pakman...and then with admin if no conclusion happens. A semi-public forum (which pakman has access to) is NOT the correct place to be discussing these things.

--elmomommyto2

Sent at: Tue Oct 09, 2007 1:01 pm


View message

Fudgemonkey
Message subject: Why did you lock the topic?Folder: Inbox
I really don't understand why you locked that topic? I did not say that we should ban pakman14. I was just raising awareness that he is not someone you should trade with. Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't see anything wrong with my post.

He has cheated people out of deals. No one has dealt with it, so I did.

-Fudgemonkey

Hopefully my PM will nip this in the bud. This is why pakman and Fudgemonkey are NOT suitable to be moderators, let alone JMs!

As far as the other issues, I'm sick and tired of him too trying to post others ideas as his own (Forum Ideas posts). Why oh why can't this JM system be revised or done away with yet?!?!?!?!?

[dgangel]

There are 71 junior moderators , out of those I can pick about 5 that should remain, all of the others should be demoted back to being a regular member.

[Peyton]

I don't like him. He asked me a question and I gave him my opinion. I didn't want him to go out and share this with the world. I am NOT happy. :mad:

[elmomommyto2]

Peyton L.,

Did he ask your permission to post your PM to him? If not (which I assume is the case), THIS MEMBER SHOULD NOT BE A JUNIOR MODERATOR!!!

[dgangel]

I doubt he did, he didnt ask my permission..

[elmomommyto2]

Thanks for replying dgangel! I've moved the topic in question here so that it won't be visible to everyone. Here is Fudgemonkey's reply that I just got:

Ok...Sorry, I didn't realize it was inappropriate. The only thing that I don't understand is why it shouldn't have been posted. We can make posts when we think a user has been faking successes even if the user is a JM. Maybe I'm just being dense. I'm sorry. I would, however like the matter of pakman14 to be addressed. I hope that you will bring it up in the Moderator Forum.

Once again, I am sorry.

-Fudgemonkey

and my reply:

Fudgemonkey,

As Carmelo15 brought up, you should have PMed pakman and if you still had a problem, you should have PMed a moderator and/or admin. At least 2 of the PMs you mentioned in your post, the members you posted them from did not give you permission to post their PMs. This is why not only has your topic been locked, but it has also been moved to the Mods forum since these members didn't want their PMs made public.

--elmomommyto2

I tried to put it as nicely as I could, but Fudgemonkey has just gotten out of hand.