Successful Email Requests???

[margotchanning]

I never said that I don't use both, because I do - but I very much prefer sending snail mail :neutral: As a real fan of the person, it's very respectful to send a hand-written request out, because you are expecting a hand-written signature are you not? I feel as if you can express yourself better in a letter that's not limited to a paragraph or two, and that if the celeb permits it, you can send your own items to be autographed - which I like doing. This is an expensive hobby and that's that.

I still don't understand why you think that someone who sends an email is not a "real fan". I know some people who also type their snailmail letters. Does that mean that they're not entitled to a handwritten signature because they don't handwrite their requests? 99.9% of the requests I send out are handwritten snailmail requests but I don't consider myself superior to those who type letters or send emails. As long as a letter is sincere, I don't think it matters whether you handwrite it, type it or email it {thumb2}

This is an expensive hobby and that's that. Yes it is but this hobby is also popular with kids who possibly don't have the funds that an adult has. It's unfair to exclude them from the hobby because they can't afford a lot of stamps. If a celebrity doesn't want to sign via email, they usually email back requesting you to send an sase. A lot of celebrities are happy to send autographs from an email request.

[The.Evening.Optimist]

I still don't understand why you think that someone who sends an email is not a "real fan".

If you read my original post, you will see I said that : "if you are a real fan of the person who you are writing to, you wouldn't mind paying that little bit of postage every time". I never said : "if you are a real fan of the person who you are writing to, you must pay that little bit of postage every time or else!!!". There's a big difference. I wasn't classifying who's a fan and who's not - just saying that if you truly admire someone, you would go that extra mile. Personally, I like sending a written request, and that's my decision. And yes, I think typed requests are lazy, can easily become generic, and lack the personal touch - much like a preprinted autograph.

[margotchanning]

I still don't understand why you think that someone who sends an email is not a "real fan".

If you read my original post, you will see I said that : "if you are a real fan of the person who you are writing to, you wouldn't mind paying that little bit of postage every time". I never said : "if you are a real fan of the person who you are writing to, you must pay that little bit of postage every time or else!!!". There's a big difference. I wasn't classifying who's a fan and who's not - just saying that if you truly admire someone, you would go that extra mile. Personally, I like sending a written request, and that's my decision. And yes, I think typed requests are lazy, can easily become generic, and lack the personal touch - much like a preprinted autograph.

There is also a big difference between not having the funds to pay postage and not minding having to pay postage. You can be a huge fan of someone but not be able to afford to buy stamps to send a letter and sase to them. You can't measure someone's admiration of someone in monetery terms! That's just silly.
Also, there are many reasons why someone would type a letter and not handwrite it. Anything from a medical condition like Arthritis to just plain awful handwriting. It's the content that makes a letter special, not the hand that writes it.
Like you, I handwrite all my letters but I don't condemn those who do things differently. There is no right and wrong way to do things. Don't be so quick to jump on people who don't follow your example.

[The.Evening.Optimist]

You're failing to see my points on many things, as well as presuming what my thoughts are. 'Condemning people'? 'Jumping on people who do not follow my example?'. I can't say I've put a gun to anyone's head and said you will do this or that. I've just given my opinion on things, which I'm entitled to. I'm not continuing this argument and it would be best if this topic was locked. By the way, I have messy handwriting, Rheumatism in my hands, and a very low income, but I still use snail-mail. I'm not forcing anyone else to, but I prefer it.

[jasonw]

Again, I believe it is more respectful and logical to send a snailmail to the celebrity, if you are expecting a snailmail reply, (i.e. a photo sent back, or our photo signed). However, if you are only expecting an email reply, with a pp autograph sent to you for you to print out, then I believe it is totally fine. As for the money thing, do you not think it costs the celebrity to send out their fanmail, they have to pay for the photos, the markers, then envolopes and the postage, and lots of their valueble time. I believe the least we could do is to send them a handwritten letter, to show our respect. So i assume, you won't mind to recive a pp photo for you to print out for those you sent an email request to, margotchanning?
Just my thoughts,
Jason.

[The.Evening.Optimist]

Well said Jason.

[jasonw]

Just to clarify, I am not against anyone here.
jason.

[morris4tyler]

Celebritys are thilthy rich. And they wouldnt be if it wasnt for there fans. I dout it if they mind spending a dollar on postage and etc.

[The.Evening.Optimist]

Not all of us write to the A-listers who have money coming out their ears. If a celeb's going to use some of their time and money on making sure there are autographed pictures kindly available for fans, the least we can do is write a letter and pay the small bit of postage required to get it.

[jasonw]

yes, some celebs are rich, and dont mind paying the thousands of pounds (c ronaldo says he spends 2000 pounds), but just because they are rich doesnt mean we dont respect them, and because they are rich, they are very busy people, maybe its not money they sacrifice for their fanmail, but their valubale time.

jason.