Danny for moderator?

Unread post by **F.A.D.E** » Mon Mar 31, 2008 10:32 am

Please only vote if you are on my team (3XF)

Don't forget to make a post to say you have voted to make your vote valid.

Everyone else are free to comment.

Danny's profile

Unread post by **glucklich** » Mon Mar 31, 2008 12:53 pm

I haven't voted yet...I'm still thinking about it, it's on the top of my "to do list" haha but I'm on the fence. He's pretty good, but there are already a lot of mods around....

Unread post by **jdp3577** » Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:26 pm

I voted yes

I dont think the argument that we have too many mods can be used as an reason to vote no. if we have too many mods the TM system needs to be closed.

Unread post by **James** » Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:21 pm

Id say he would be good on the request an address, but think we have enough as it is, but its hard to say..

RuleroftheWorld · Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:26 pm

jdp3577 wrote:I voted yes

I dont think the argument that we have too many mods can be used as an reason to vote no. if we have too many mods the TM system needs to be closed.

A stronger argument for voting no is that we already have several "younger" Moderators. The fact that 95% of the TMs are immature doesnt bode well for promotions. Yes some youngsters have been promtoed and have done a good job (Im not naming names either way), but some have not, and "we" dont seem to have learnt this lesson yet.

Having a large number of (no offence) kids as Moderators on a site of this size is not the best of ideas IMO.

Unread post by **James** » Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:54 am

Not all kids are imature though ;)

RuleroftheWorld · Tue Apr 01, 2008 12:29 pm

James wrote:Not all kids are imature though ;)

Which is why I said some kids have done a good job

Unread post by **F.A.D.E** » Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:57 pm

Andy316 wrote:
A stronger argument for voting no is that we already have several "younger" Moderators. The fact that 95% of the TMs are immature doesnt bode well for promotions. Yes some youngsters have been promtoed and have done a good job (Im not naming names either way), but some have not, and "we" dont seem to have learnt this lesson yet.

Having a large number of (no offence) kids as Moderators on a site of this size is not the best of ideas IMO.

Danny's profile page says he is 33 years old...

I don't think he's a kid.

Fatima xxx

Unread post by **F.A.D.E** » Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:58 pm

I've voted.

RuleroftheWorld · Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:38 pm

F.A.D.E wrote:
Andy316 wrote:
A stronger argument for voting no is that we already have several "younger" Moderators. The fact that 95% of the TMs are immature doesnt bode well for promotions. Yes some youngsters have been promtoed and have done a good job (Im not naming names either way), but some have not, and "we" dont seem to have learnt this lesson yet.

Having a large number of (no offence) kids as Moderators on a site of this size is not the best of ideas IMO.
Danny's profile page says he is 33 years old... I don't think he's a kid.

Fatima xxx

There was no age on his profile when I posted that, I find it very strange that one has suddenly been added after I made that post