I recently wrote to Mr. Bush and he sent me this in the SASE I sent to him. It was a honor to get it and made my day. I wrote to the white house and it took a little while to get it. I mailed out on 23 June 2008 and received on 2 Sep. 2008. I also received another presidential photo a few monthes later from that I did not write for. It did not come with letter and got it on 21 Jan. 2009. I was tickled to get it also and a individual presidential photo. I was wandering if the signature in the letter was authentic or not? Thanks~!
To register with Fanmail.biz, you must agree to the terms of the website. The last term says;
"You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-orientated or any other material that may violate any laws be it of your country, the country where “Fanmail.biz†is hosted or International Law. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned, with notification of your Internet Service Provider if deemed required by us. The IP address of all posts are recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that “Fanmail.biz†have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should we see fit. As a user you agree to any information you have entered to being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent, neither “Fanmail.biz†nor phpBB shall be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised. "
It's obvious that you don't agree with George W. Bush since your profile says that your favorite success is Obama. However, you are breaking your own rules when you say that Bush's autograph isn't real because it's not in crayon. That is hateful. It's a shame that you aren't following the rules of a website that you moderate. You are a hypocrite.
The Bionic Fan did not ask for any kind of input other than if the autograph was authentic.