Keira Knightley charity success! Authenticity help plz!

Are you unsure if your autograph is authentic or not? Post it in here and the Fanmail.biz community will try to clear it up for you.
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial <<arrow$

Image Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur
redtoffee
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 3:39 pm
Contact:

Keira Knightley charity success! Authenticity help plz!

Unread post by redtoffee »

I sent a charity headed LOR plus an SAE on 13/08/2009 and received 2 4x6ish signed photos on 08/10/2009 one for myself and one for my charity WAMCARE

Obviously they are not preprints as they are different. But I know some people think they are secretarial so thoughts would be good! I have had one comment that they might be sec so would be really good to know. I cant put it up for auction without knowing.

Image

Image

thank you for your help!

Laura
~X~
User avatar
paulmustang1
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Keira Knightley charity success! Authenticity help plz!

Unread post by paulmustang1 »

I have read she resigns photos i have recieved the same autograph.I believe it to be real.
mufcdd
Autograph Collector
Autograph Collector
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Keira Knightley charity success! Authenticity help plz!

Unread post by mufcdd »

I believe them to be authentic. I made a huge thread on her TTMs being secretarial a while back, in particular those black and white pics, but the sigs you have are vastly different from the usual b&w pic sigs.They actually look fine unlike the usual really poor looking broken down sigs she sends.
dansautos
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:40 am
Contact:

Re: Keira Knightley charity success! Authenticity help plz!

Unread post by dansautos »

mufcdd wrote:I believe them to be authentic. I made a huge thread on her TTMs being secretarial a while back, in particular those black and white pics, but the sigs you have are vastly different from the usual b&w pic sigs.They actually look fine unlike the usual really poor looking broken down sigs she sends.
I agree that it is different from her usual secretarial, but it looks like another secretarial to me. The second K in her IP's for many years now looks pretty much the same as her first K. This one just looks kind of weird and unlike her signature to me.


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests