Yeah seamus' other "success" were 110% fake, I deleted the threads and gave him a warning a while ago. Hopefully that will be enough for him to stay honest from now on.afem1010 wrote:I agree
and this kind of thing just proves our point : viewtopic.php?f=2&t=95772
basically seamus's success was a big hoax or the luck of a draw. I don't think it was a luck of the draw
hockeyfan1994
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!
Search the message board
Sponsored link: Browse safely with Opera free VPN! Download now!


Re: hockeyfan1994
Re: hockeyfan1994
Going back to hockeyfan1994 (1994....14 yr old maybe?), has anyone seen this old post of his?
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... t=#p404371
Doesnt seem very likely
http://www.fanmail.biz/mboard/viewtopic ... t=#p404371
Doesnt seem very likely

Re: hockeyfan1994
Charlize Theron vV? being authentic? thats a first
I just don't believe the guy unless he paid the celebrity to sign the photo. Its quite stupid really. Even if you ask him, he is just gonna say "oh, you don't know anything. I have the autograph."
He has either bribed the celebrity, or has good contacts. or just knows how to buy stuff online.
I have asked him for the envelope, lets see what happens. I am waiting my own Freeman. Lets see about that too
I just don't believe the guy unless he paid the celebrity to sign the photo. Its quite stupid really. Even if you ask him, he is just gonna say "oh, you don't know anything. I have the autograph."
He has either bribed the celebrity, or has good contacts. or just knows how to buy stuff online.
I have asked him for the envelope, lets see what happens. I am waiting my own Freeman. Lets see about that too
Re: hockeyfan1994
Not just Theron (and others) but more specifically, this -
"I wrote to Ben Stiller via Meet the Frockers movie and i sent a photo of him and Robert DeNiro from the first movie. I didn't ask him to have Robert DeNiro sign the photo he just had him sign it and sent back to me"
I dont believe that at all.
"I wrote to Ben Stiller via Meet the Frockers movie and i sent a photo of him and Robert DeNiro from the first movie. I didn't ask him to have Robert DeNiro sign the photo he just had him sign it and sent back to me"
I dont believe that at all.
Re: hockeyfan1994
Andy316 wrote:Not just Theron (and others) but more specifically, this -
"I wrote to Ben Stiller via Meet the Frockers movie and i sent a photo of him and Robert DeNiro from the first movie. I didn't ask him to have Robert DeNiro sign the photo he just had him sign it and sent back to me"
I dont believe that at all.
yeah, that doesn't really happen lol
Re: hockeyfan1994
To me it is very simple. Those "success" from him are all purchased or obtained in person. I do agree he probably adds in the inscription or something. He must be really good if he IS 14 years old. Or maybe thats just lie as well. Could be a decoy. Anyway, something has to be done as i can see this poster more than likely selling things in the other forum soon. Keep your eyes peeled.
Chrissy
Chrissy

Thank you -Lil1- for the siggie set!
- celebrityfan
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 1441
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 10:37 am
- Contact:
Re: hockeyfan1994
Hey,
I don't think he is 14 years old...1994 was when he first started collecting. This means he's been collecting for 14 years so collecting those autographs in person would be possible. I pmed him a couple of weeks ago asking what 1994 meant and that's what he told me.
I don't think he is 14 years old...1994 was when he first started collecting. This means he's been collecting for 14 years so collecting those autographs in person would be possible. I pmed him a couple of weeks ago asking what 1994 meant and that's what he told me.


Auto count: 185
Gerard Butler = The Next Bond
Visit my site! http://www.freewebs.com/celebrityfanautos

Credit to: hangman
Re: hockeyfan1994
yes, but those are not In Person. Those are Via Venue. If they were in Person, this topic would not exist. The fact that all there successes are Via Venue and also at a time when people don't sign the autographs, like Hugh Jackman, its kind of strangecelebrityfan wrote:Hey,
I don't think he is 14 years old...1994 was when he first started collecting. This means he's been collecting for 14 years so collecting those autographs in person would be possible. I pmed him a couple of weeks ago asking what 1994 meant and that's what he told me.
Re: hockeyfan1994
I think what Steffi means is that his autographs posing as vv successes could in fact have been collected IP within the 14 years he has been collecting. At least that's what I think. I still highly doubt there's ANY possibility that he received any of those via venue. 


Thanks to -Lil1- for my great sig!


Re: hockeyfan1994
oh my bad
if thats the case, that is a possibility. However, he did explicitly say that these were obtained Via Venue. Like the Ben stiller auto being signed by another when he sent the request. Its all a made up story then from the beginning.
if thats the case, that is a possibility. However, he did explicitly say that these were obtained Via Venue. Like the Ben stiller auto being signed by another when he sent the request. Its all a made up story then from the beginning.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests