Upload your pictures here: 
So, in the past two years, I've sent Christina 5 letters or more, trying to get her autograph but never did for the longest time when I saw others getting response. I got two response in the past 6 months (which I believe to be auto-pens). This one came back today and I know it's older because in the last 6 months, I started writing Return addresses in the left corner and this didn't have one written and only two stamps...I use 3 now. lol Anyways, I know this request was from at least a year ago and they found it some how. hehe!
I sent LOR, Pictures?, and a SASE to this address (I believe):
Christina Aguilera
Azoffmusic Management
1100 Glendon Avenue
Suite 2000
Los Angeles, CA 90024
USA
Here are scans on my Image Shack website:
(Christina #1)
(Christina #2)
http://my.imageshack.us/v_images.php (My website)
Received: 3/13/12, TWO signed photos. Now, there has been controversy on whether these are atuo-pens or not. The thing is, they are not identical and there are differences in the signature, which would be a indicator they are authentic (pre-signed, likely). However, I have a hunch that they are STILL auto-pens (the pen strokes seem to press down too hard which makes me think it's an auto pen because when people sign a photograph, the signature is more careless and softly written, if that makes sense. Not pushing the pen into the picture). Maybe I'm being paranoid, but there is something I'm not buying about these. Can anyone please give me any input? Please be honest...if they are auto pens, I want to know. I don't want to believe they are real and all along, they are not. Thank you fanmail for your help.
Sincerely,
gghi18 (Mark)
P.S. If anyone's curious, here's another one I got months back (same picture is the current ones I got) and I believed it to be auto penned.
I see differences in all 3 signatures but something seems off. This specific autograph above looks shaky. Any thoughts? Thanks!
