I'm wondeering about this b/c I'd sent off a few letters and didn't put the "c/o" and the name of ...whatever place they're going to. I guess I asumed that just putting the address on it would get it there.
I hope this isn't a dumb question.
how important is the "c/o" in addresses?I
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial
Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial


-
- Autograph Collector
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:27 am
- Contact:
hey
hey
i think its ok as long as you have the correct address
thats what my dad says anyways it should be fine
write back
love always
caitlin
i think its ok as long as you have the correct address
thats what my dad says anyways it should be fine
write back
love always
caitlin
-
- Posts: 3068
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 6:11 am
- Contact:
Hi kristina7 
In most instances it shouldn't be a problem. It should get through as normal.
There have been instances in the past where people have not put "c/o" and it's come back as RTS, while those that have put c/o have received responses. I guess whomever has been handling the mail has been picky.
You should write c/o just to be on the safe side, especially if you're writing to their agent or other organisation.
nowandagain [rockon]

In most instances it shouldn't be a problem. It should get through as normal.
There have been instances in the past where people have not put "c/o" and it's come back as RTS, while those that have put c/o have received responses. I guess whomever has been handling the mail has been picky.
You should write c/o just to be on the safe side, especially if you're writing to their agent or other organisation.
nowandagain [rockon]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests