hey guys... i have just purchased some original 1960's photographs of Carol Burnett and Julie Andrews rehearsing for one of their tv specials. They are worth quite abit of money now, do u think they would be worth more if i had them signed?? or do you think that it would spoil them a little?? i can't make up my mind....
Everyone's help/opinions would be much appreciated...
cheers........
Should i get my original 1960's photos signed??
Forum rules
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial
Upload your pictures here: Surf My Pictures | Google Photos | Imgbb | Tumblr | Imgur
Sponsored link: Google Workspace 14-day free trial


Yes.. that is true. That wouldn't be good if i didn't get them back. They are not the kind of celebs who are out and about that much though.. so would be hard to get them IP. i'll have to think more..Nammzi wrote:If they are special to you then I wouldn't send them as there is a chance that you may not get them sent back. I don't see why it would ruin the photos, but it ia really up to you.
Thanks for replying...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests